Menu Home

OFAC Enforcement Action: First Data Resources, LLC fined $23,336

First Data provided third party data processing services to a SDNT (Specially Designated Narcotics Trafficker), with a total value of $69,144. Since the violations were voluntarily self-disclosed and were non-egregious, the base penalty was cut in half to $34,572.

So, why did First Data pay about 2/3 of the base penalty?

    • First Data failed to exercise a minimal degree of caution or care in
      reviewing the information flagged by its interdiction software;
    • First Data had reason to know that
      it was providing services to an SDNT as early as February 25, 2011, the date on which First
      Data’s automated interdiction software flagged the SDNT as a potential match;
    • The alleged
      violations caused significant harm to U.S. sanctions program objectives by conveying economic
      benefit to an SDNT and undermining the policy objectives of U.S. counternarcotics sanctions;
    • First Data is a highly sophisticated commercial entity;
    • First Data has no prior sanctions history in
      the five years preceding the date of the earliest transaction giving rise to the alleged violations;
    • The majority of the alleged violations occurred due to a deficiency in First Data’s OFAC
      compliance program that incorrectly categorized potential matches to OFAC’s List of Specially
      Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (the “SDN List”), and the remainder of the alleged
      violations occurred due to a deficiency in First Data’s OFAC compliance program that allowed
      its client to reactivate the SDNT’s access to First Data services even after First Data deactivated
      the SDNT’s access in order to comply with OFAC regulations;
    • First Data took remedial action to
      correct the deficiency in its categorization of potential matches to the SDN List; and
    • First Data
      cooperated with OFAC during OFAC’s investigation of the alleged violations.

So, to sum it up, First Data was a little sloppy, and their program had some holes in it – but they were not willful, and that saved them from a much larger fine had it been judged to be egregious. Considering the statutory maximum for the narcotics programs can be as high as $1,075,000 per transaction, that’s a pretty big deal.

Link:

OFAC Enforcement Information

 

Categories: Enforcement Actions OFAC Updates Settlements

eric9to5

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: